By Brad Rees
As the Atlético Madrid team bus rocks up to the San Siro stadium on Saturday, the Blaupunckt stereo system will be blasting out ‘Thunderstruck’ by Ozzie MetalGods, AC/DC. It’s an Atléti tradition. Torres and chums will be chanting, ‘Thunder, thunder, thunder, thunder, I was caught in the middle of a railroad track.’
How can we not root for them to win this weekend’s compelling ‘El Derby’ – the global game of football that will whet our Euro 2016 appetite?
Last week, I wrote about the swelling social TV audience of reality show, Geordie Shore - which boasts 40 million fans who crave their weekly TV fix by hyper-posting and possibly -ventillating on social media in between shows.
Reality drama TV format salesmen take note; your pitch is compelling but in a dwarf-throwing Wolf of Wall Street kind of way, compared to the power of global sport.
Our appetite for the most-watched sport on the planet is incredible. The 2014 FIFA World Cup reached 3.2 billion TV viewers with 1 in every three of them using a second screen at some point throughout the global stadium experience.
The ‘average’ UK sports fan spends 7hr 24min following sport in a typical week, compared to 5hr 24min on social media, 5hr 12min doing housework or 4hr 30 min exercising.
Of course, the above ESPN research doesn’t cross-correlate the usage habits of Hyde Park ‘bankers’ who push their kid-laden Land Rover buggies around the Serpentine, while simultaneously running the labradoodle alongside, simulcasting fitbit data and Chelsea scores to Facebook and Twitter.
If you dig deeper into the consumption habits of sports fans down to device level 9 out of ten fans depend on their iPhone to follow sports news, while 7 out of every ten punters use an iPad.
Unsurprisingly, for the ink-stained hacks among us, see Mediacells correct New Day predictions, 23% of sports fans read a newspaper on a daily basis, which still seems high to me, unless you classify free rags like the Metro in this category, then it would seem low.
Meanwhile, Saturday’s Champions League matchday will keep it real, being watched in over 200 territories with 77% of us watching the TV with some second screen digital accoutrement like a laptop, tablet or smart thing.
And according to Google, there’s a frenetic amount of searching that goes on during matches, as social fans try and outsmart or countersmart their fellow amateur stattos, with 63% of them researching on a mobile phone. Again this seems low.
This is the opportunity Atlético Madrid have been waiting for since 2014, when they suffered a 4-1 drubbing at the hands of Real Madrid in the Champions League final.
If they do manage to nick it, who is to say that all those fairweather LATAM fans won’t change their allegiances overnight to the non-Real La Finca residents?
The Latin American digital landscape is rapidly expanding with Mexico, Chile, Peru, Argentina and Colombia leading the trend.
This would allow the club to shrug off the “El Pupas” curse (the jinxed ones) and miracle-working manager, Diego ‘El Cholo’ Simeone will be able to deliver some massive and scaleable eyeballs (I know that sounds very wrong) to his chief executive, Miguel Gil.
Incidentally, Señor Gil categorically doesn’t attend Atlético games, at least that’s what he told Simon Kuper the FT in late 2015:
“I watch the day after on TV. It’s the best way to check the decisions of the coach, when your heart is quiet”.
Six months is a long time in football and an even longer time in digital – so although the betting odds are stacked against his team winning the Cup, I reckon there’s shorter odds on him dipping into the Club Atlético app for updates.
By Brad Rees
Love it or hate it, MTV’s licence-to-ill DocuSoap has wiped the floor with all previous traditional ratings records and amassed a vibrant, engaged social audience in the process.
An army of digital natives gorge on content, not just for the 42 minutes per episode but 24/7 – as new and old habits collide and somehow converge.
You could argue, and I would, that Geordie Shore’s accumulating success is fuelled by content consumed and in a lot of cases created on social.
As TV bible, Broadcast magazine puts it, media owners shouldn’t see the young audience’s nano-flit between TV and social as grounds for divorce:
“Polygamy is the new normal – and multiplatform juggernauts like Geordie Shore simply have to be available on every platform because that’s where the audience expects to find it!”
As the silicon valley social monoliths get deeper into the potential of long-form TV content – broadcasters need to join in the conversation.
The elephant in the room for all social platforms is whether the Netflix-commissioned model could go super-stellar on, say, Facebook or would that be a bit like the pub landlord playing his son’s under-11s camcorder footage on the jumboscreen, instead of Sky Sports on Saturday at 3pm?
The show’s average audience amongst 16-34 year-old digital natives has grown to its highest level ever in the ultimate series, which finished its run on MTV UK this month. Over eight episodes the 12th series attracted Geordie Shore’s highest average TV audience, peaking at 1.4 million viewers – a record for any MTV show in the UK.
Many of the narratives that run throughout shows like Geordie Shore, Made in Chelsea, TOWIE are threaded with themes of betrayal, unfaithfulness and two-timing tossers.
The single narrative thread running through the five years of TV, online and social data for Newcastle’s best known lads and lasses’ televised shagfest is of an audience who are habitually promiscuous in their viewing habits.
They are, at the very least, four-timers: doing it on scheduled, recorded, on-demand, pay TV and that’s not including the squillions of video bites available on MTV.co.uk, where weekly Geordie Shore clips account for eight of every 10 clips viewed.
I’ll leave the last word to Kerry Taylor, MTV’s brand lead outside the U.S. who commissioned the first series of Geordie Shore:
“Multi-platform, multi-screen viewing is now the norm for young viewers everywhere. Geordie Shore’s success illustrates the importance of delivering media experiences which perfectly fit the changing lifestyle and viewing habits of young audiences.”
Start by understanding what makes them tick at work, says Deloitte
By Brad Rees
We’ve all had that job that never makes it to the CV or LinkedIn halls of fame.
Mine was working for Alternative Corporate Entertainment PLC or ‘ACE’, where I was tasked to sell ‘Novelty Entertainment Acts’ (NEAs) to global business monoliths from the boss’s front room in Vauxhall.
I had got dangerously close to placing faux 1970s teddy boy schlock ‘n’ rollers, Showaddywaddy, at the Reuters Fleet Street 1989 Christmas party, before their Brummie agent shot me down with the ultimate reality check as I tried to knock him down on fees:
“Listen son, if you want Under the Moon of Love on a stick you’ll have to cough up with the readies; these fellas are a bit long in the tooth for all of this jam-for-tomorrow bullshit.”
I remember putting down the phone, lighting up a cigarette, with my feet now on the table and drawing deeply on a Marlboro Red before saying to my boss, “The corporate entertainment world is not for me, I’m going to Brazil, I quit.” I was 22 and I’d been in the role a grand total of three-and-a-half days.
My next job lasted a good deal longer in the Southern Hemisphere and then a timeline of two-year workhopping stints throughout my twenties and early thirties, before the stabilising influence of marriage, kids, mortgages, pensions, staycations, mortality.
Deloitte’s fifth global Millennial Survey of hipsters’ hopes and dreams paints a picture of an emerging decision-making workforce who have not so much one eye on the door as one foot out of it. The management consultancy firm warns of an emerging epidemic of what it calls ‘loyalty challenge’.
Out of the 7,700 participants born after 1982 from 29 countries, one in four of the buggers are planning ‘near-term exits’ from their current employers. The days of working the way up the greasy corporate pole is so last century, with a stonking 82% of Peruvian under-34-year-olds saying they will be doing a ‘Paddington Bear’ and leaving their current organisation within the next five years.
And it’s not just emerging nations where the workhopping bug is biting deep, in the UK 71% of the same demographic said their five-year plan included a career move.
There’s a great Urban Dictionary quote which says Millennials believe ‘themselves to be overachievers who just aren’t understood by their loser bosses’. This superiority complex seems to be borne out in the Deloitte data with six in ten of them complaining their “leadership skills are not being fully developed.”
It looks like employers aren’t doing enough to bridge the gap between outgoing workhoppers and incoming workhoppees, and neglecting their responsiblity of ensuring a new generation of business leaders.
The elephant the Deloitte research elegantly leaves lingering in the room, near the retro Shoreditch standard lamp, is the potential drop-out rates of 18-34-year-olds who decide to spin out of the traditional job market altogether, with life outweighing work.
The research comes close to annunciating the emerging slacker phenomenon when approaching the subject of flexible working, striking a balance.
Central to the issue of flexible working is the mobile phone. According to the survey 70% were able to access email and relevant applications from mobile devices with less of them able to work flexible hours and only 43% of them being allowed to work from home or other locations.
This current level of flexibility is not consistent with Millennials’ desires with 88% wishing they could start and finish work at the times they choose – while 77% of them wish to have greater mobile connectivity via tablets and smartphones, with a view to working remotely more frequently – with the belief they will be more productive.
It’s the WFH metric which would increase levels of satisfaction and in this generation’s opinion, boost productivity; 51% of them expected productivity to increase if people in their organisations could work from home or outside of the workplace at least.
That warm and fuzzy ‘freedom’ feeling loops back into the loyalty challenge, where most of the survey respondents expressed that if they felt more in control of their careers, they would feel more empowered and would therefore stick around longer.
All the insights need to be read in the context of a missing variable, which is that work/life balance comes before career progression ONLY when salary and other financial benefits are removed from the research dialogue. A bit like the insight gleaned from Showaddywaddy’s agent all those years ago, I guess.
By Brad Rees Last week I realised the true value of being a follower when I discovered an amazing story by Hillsborough survivor, Adrian Tempany, after it was promoted in a tweet by sportswriter David Conn. It was 5,000 words long, which meant a lot of iPhone thumbscrolls on a Sunday afternoon when I should have been helping […]
Tim Cook will have woken to the news that Facebook has tripled its advertising revenues. The news has stunned Wall Street in much the same way that Apple’s revenue-drop news, 24 hours previously, had shocked the media world. The surprise came despite an apparent expectation management exercise, masterminded by mister Cook in January. Apple soothsayers […]
It’s 1977. The Goblin Teasmade advert is on television screens, Punk is hitting the UK streets and Clifton Country Primary (CCP) are engaged in the dying embers of a grudge soccer match against arch pre-teen rivals, Mayfield. It’s nil-nil. CCP have just brought on a substitute, Steven Roundtree. He’s new to the team and it […]
Google’s Al might have stuffed the Go champ but youthful instagrammers are sticking it to the machine. Google’s Al beat the top player of the ancient and complex game, Go, at the DeepMind Challenge, recently. It didn’t so much beat the South Korean champion, Lee Sedol, as wipe the board with him 4 straight wins […]
Last week’s launch of a print-only newspaper excited journalists – but is it sustainable in a digitised consumer world? When I started my newspaper career in the late nineties ‘digital’ was called ‘the bloody internet’. “Forget about the bloody internet,” my ink-stained tabloid boss would argue, before resting his case on some surreal, qualitative Hollywood […]